

第1页 / 共16页

第2页 / 共16页

第3页 / 共16页
试读已结束,还剩13页,您可下载完整版后进行离线阅读
© 版权声明
本素材源于网络采集或用户分享,版权归属原作者。平台仅提供存储及技术服务,所收费用用于服务器及运营成本,不包含版权授权。若您认为内容侵权,请邮件至【hackerxyyp@qq.com】提交权属证明,我们将在48小时内下架处理。
THE END
Section IUse of EnglishDirections:Read the following text.Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and markA,B,C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1.(10 points)The ethical judgments of the Supreme Court justices have become an importantissue recently.The court cannot I its legitimacy as guardian of the rule oflaw 2 justices behave like politicians.Yet,in several instances,justices acted inways that 3 the court's reputation for being independent and impartial.Justice Antonin Scalia,for example,appeared at political events.That kind ofactivity makes it less likely that the court's decisions will be 4 as impartialjudgments.Part of the problem is that the justices are not 5 by an ethics code.At the very least,the court should make itself 6 to the code of conductthat 7 to the rest of the federal judiciary.This and other similar cases 8 the question of whether there is stilla 9 between the court and politics.The framers of the Constitution envisioned law 10 having authority apartfrom politics.They gave justices permanent positions 11 they would be freeto 12 those in power and have no need to 13 political support.Our legalsystem was designed to set law apart from politics precisely because they are soclosely 14Constitutional law is political because it results from choices rooted infundamental social 15 like liberty and property.When the court deals withsocial policy decisions,the law it 16 is inescapably political which is whydecisions split along ideological lines are so easily 17 as unjust.The justices must 18 doubts about the court's legitimacy by makingthemselves 19 to the code of conduct.That would make rulings more likely tobe seen as separate from politics and,20,convincing as law..2.
暂无评论内容